The content of this note will surprise some of you. Others, knowing me more personally, will not be shocked at all. Nevertheless, I feel compelled to share a few thoughts concerning what we have lost in regards to our observance of Christmas in the United States.
Sorry, but in saying that, I do not mean the religious aspects. One need not “keep Christ in Christmas,” in order to placate me. I say this because Christmas has absolutely nothing to do with Christ. Jesus was not born on December 25, 4 B.C. , in Bethlehem. We do not know when He was born. The Bible does not say. It does tell us that shepherds were watching their flocks outside at night. If you note the latitude and longitude of that region, you realize that they are now in meteorological winter as well. Can you imagine God allowing Mary to give birth to Immanuel in a cold, drafty barn during a winter’s night? Considering how He planned some 4,000 years of human history for that moment to arrive, one must conclude that better provision would have been made for Mary, Joseph, and Jesus, even if our Lord was meant to be born in a pastoral setting. Beyond the impracticability of an outdoor birth on December 25, is the testimony of early Christian writers. Perhaps it would be more accurate to say their silence on the matter. If this was something embraced by the followers of Christ, do you not suppose that the earliest Christians would have written something about this belief? Yet, what they emphasized was His death and resurrection as a source of hope to fallen humanity.
From whence comes Christmas, then? It is the mixture of Christian and pagan traditions. The Romans celebrated Saturnalia during December 25. It is from Saturnalia that we get such traditions as the use of mistletoe and greenery as decoration. Other cultures subdued by Roman might saw this as a time to thank the gods for giving them back the sun. (If you’ll note, beginning with the winter solstice, the days do begin to stretch longer each day.) Of the non-Roman traditions, we note a god worshiped by the Roman legions named Mithra. This Persian god was born of a virgin on December 25, and was also a god of the son. Do you see how easily misguided Christians wanting to convert pagans could use the story of Mithra, change it a bit, and offer pagans a more palatable, “Christian” alternative? Through the years, all of these traditions somewhat merged to become the Christmas with which we are more familiar.
(One positive thing that came from the association of Christ with Christmas, though, is that of giving. We are mindful of the statement made of Jesus’ teaching outside the Gospels, that, “It is more blessed to give than to receive” (Acts 20:35 NIV). People seem more charitable at this time of the year than any other. Indeed, we see such charities as “Toys For Tots” and “Operation Christmas Child” collect items to brighten a needy child’s day. We likewise see people do the majority of their giving to such organizations as “Easter Seals” and the “American Cancer Society” at Christmas. Another positive result of the association of Christ to Christmas is that of a sense of goodwill that people seem more willing to extend to others. You see more smiling faces and the person behind you in traffic is more likely to let you cut in than give you an obscene gesture.)
Of all of the traditions that developed, though, was a sense of purpose to bring family and friends closer together. The feasting and the wassailing enabled people to escape the cold grip of winter and enjoy the warmth arising from the human heart. An interesting Christmas movie is “The Lion In Winter” with Peter O’Toole and Katherine Hepburn. It is a fictionalized account of a Christmas that an aging King Henry II spent with his sons and his queen, Eleanor of Aquitaine. Since divorce was not permissible, Eleanor had been locked away in another castle. Yet, each Christmas, Henry would let Eleanor out and treat her as the queen she literally was. In the movie, Eleanor schemes with her sons to usurp Henry’s throne, but fails. In the end, though, as Eleanor is being sent back to her imprisonment we find a warm exchange between her and Henry:
Henry: I should have been a great fool… not to love you.
Eleanor: You’ll let me out for Easter?
Henry: Come the resurrection, you can strike me down again.
Eleanor: Perhaps next time I’ll do it.
Henry: And perhaps you won’t.
Eleanor: You know, I hope we never die!
Henry: So do I.
Eleanor: You think there’s any chance of it?
Despite the subterfuge and the animosity, in the end, the love one tends to feel at Christmas won out over all of Henry and Eleanor’s hatred and vitriol. One is left with the impression that, despite what today would be called “irreconcilable differences” that these two loved each other and that it was Christmas that reminded them of this lost love.
Christmas was not about showering someone with a bunch of cold, inanimate things. Yet, in the United States, when we think of Christmas, we think more of the latest technological gadgets and the fashions. We think of money and gift certificates. We have lost the sense of gathering and of belonging that was once at the heart of Christmas. Who sings the carols? Who shares hot Russian tea or spiced cider? Who opens his or her home to those who would otherwise be left alone? I realize that there are those who do these things. However, it seems missing from the national scene. The central figure of Christmas in the United States has become Santa Claus, the bringer of stuff. (Though the man upon whom this legend is based was more about giving than materialism.)
I have foreign friends with whom I regularly exchange email and chat. As one Czech friend spoke of looking forward to Christmas, he mentioned attending the market to buy warm wine, boiled corn, and sweets. Though these things would be partaken of in the open air on a cold night in Prague, he was looking forward to it as these would be the activities that he shared with his family and friends. It has been humbling and refreshing to hear of these Christmas traditions held by my new friends, some of whom not are not blessed materially as Americans. As I contemplated the coming holiday, I thought of how nice it would be to have something like my friend’s pending market experience. I would take that over an iPad or a Blackberry any day. (Perhaps it took cancer for me to realize this. In which case, even cancer becomes a greater and greater blessing to me.)
Friends, take a moment this year to regain a little something of what we have lost in our observance of Christmas. Make it more about family and friends. Talk to the aged in your life about Christmases past and hear the joy they express in receiving only stockings stuffed with candy and oranges, of receiving the one little doll, or the single football. And, by all means, make new traditions that will outlive that sweater or gps unit. Your children will look back upon such simple and loving Christmases more fondly than the latest Wii video game. More importantly, what a great legacy they will have to share with their own children. If you wish to attribute such qualities to the remembrance of Christ, then I would urge you only to make Him the reason for every season of your life and not to wait until just one time each year to pull out the greatest of what He taught to live out in your daily life. If you want a “Happy Holiday,” rather than a “Merry Christmas,” then remember why holidays originated. These are days that have been designated for a special purpose. The holiday on December 25 can be a richer and fuller one for you if you remember that it was designated to be a time of caring and sharing. Christmas may only be a week away. However, it is not too late to ensure that it is the greatest one you have ever had, made possible by the restoration of those things we seem to have forgotten.
Tags: Christmas



